Prosecutor of Estado Assistant Jeff Ashton shows documents entomologist Dr. Tim Huntington during cross examination day 21 of the trial for murder of first degree of Casey Anthony in the Palace of Justice in Orange County, Orlando, Florida, on Friday. (Red Huber, Orlando Sentinel and the 16 June 2011)Casey Anthony defense team had a very good tomorrow on Friday calling for an expert well versed bug that expressed doubts: based on insect evidence: that a body was never hidden drive of women.
Friday afternoon was a different story: Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton savaged forensic entomologist Dr. Tim Huntington with a brutal interrogation. All Ashton, from the experience of Huntington challenged the validity of their opinions to their failure to include one of those comments in a report prepared for this case.
For example, Ashton got Huntington, a key defense expert, to admit that when it examined Pontiac Sunfire of Casey Anthony in July, approximately two years after the death of Caylee, the car still smelled.
Professor of biology at Concordia University in Nebraska attributed the smell, possibly to the trash that had been in the car. But later, he acknowledged that there was no apparent source of food in the waste.
Several other witnesses, including the parents of Casey Anthony, said that the Pontiac smelled like a dead body had been inside. Casey Anthony, 25, is charged with first-degree murder in the death of her 2-year-old Marie Caylee.
The Prosecutor's Office said that the body of the child was placed in the trunk of the car before that she was finally abandoned in some woods near the home of Anthony. His remains were not discovered until December 2008, several months later he was missing Caylee.
Huntington said that Ashton on Friday demonstrated insect of recovery of Caylee scene indicated that the body had moved to the forest after decomposition probably two or three days, a time more or less consistent with the theory of the State line.
He also confirmed that the body probably was wooded there months before, another statement of support from the theory of the State.
Huntington said that heavily supported an explanation about insects conclusions included in a report by Dr. Neal Haskell, expert of insects in the Prosecutor's Office.
When asked Ashton on study of decomposition of Huntington of pigs in the trunk of a car, pointed out that the pigs were not wrapped in blankets and bags the remains of the Caylee is believed to have been placed in the car of his mother.
"Why not meet their pigs in a blanket?" Ashton asked, which causes laughter in the courtroom.
Soon, however, Huntington seemed points of defence when asked by Attorney Jose Baez.
"If we assume that it is a body in the trunk of a car, would expect to find hundreds if not thousands of these blow flies," said Huntington. "They are there." Die there. "They are stuck there."
On the other hand, only one leg of a fly apparent coup was found in the trunk.
Huntington also said the presence of other insects - most common, other types of species of fly - in a garbage bag, once placed in the car was not surprising, nor indicative of human decomposition.
"Its presence completely is expected given that it is a bag of garbage," he said. At another point, Huntington, said, "is a bag of garbage with the garbage feeding insects." "There is no nothing remarkable respect."
At one point, outside the presence of the jury, Huntington told the lawyers, for me, there is no reason to think that the worms came from a corpse.
The Prosecutor's Office has presented the argument that indicative of human decomposition fatty acids and is found in paper towels are what draws flies.
Ashton later succeeded Huntington to recognize that the chloroform can be used to kill insects. Chloroform was found in high concentrations in air samples taken the trunk of the Pontiac. Even so, Huntington insisted chloroform would have not kept these flies far unless it was in the levels of displace oxygen.
Towards the end of the day, Huntington said Baez, "the tests have no sense any aspect in which say that it is a body in the trunk".
When shown a photo of a spot on the car, Huntington says no resemble the stain of human decomposition.
But he later acknowledged Ashton that: he did not consider the Mancha Real; is not a forensic anthropologist; This was the first time that he had order that identify a spot of decay through a photo; and it did not include this opinion in its report.
Ashton asked why that opinion was not in his report and only surfaced in the trial, while he had previously discussed with Baez.
"I not thought that he was going to be raised with me," he said.
The trial resumes with testimony more expected at 0900 hours today.
acolarossi@Tribune.com or 407-420-5447.
No comments:
Post a Comment